LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Dirty Leeds. General Chat. Anything goes – just don’t be soft.
Titman
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:32 pm
Reactions score: 366

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Titman »

X2
Rick
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 3442
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:45 pm
Reactions score: 339

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Rick »

Yeah, get in again
Titman
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:32 pm
Reactions score: 366

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Titman »

X3
Rick
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 3442
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:45 pm
Reactions score: 339

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Rick »

Get ins
Titman
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:32 pm
Reactions score: 366

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Titman »

Cracking half considering they’ve turned up with a back 6. That first goal was so important.
Titman
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:32 pm
Reactions score: 366

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Titman »

Minutes for Solomon, Guilavogui & Chambers
Titman
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:32 pm
Reactions score: 366

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Titman »

Good effort from Crew
Titman
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:32 pm
Reactions score: 366

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Titman »

Wendies hit for 6
Titman
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:32 pm
Reactions score: 366

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Titman »

Happy with that
Rick
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 3442
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:45 pm
Reactions score: 339

Re: LUFC v The Pilgrim Fathers #OMDT

Post by Rick »

Yep very good. James looking back to his best. Solomon looked better today. The new DM looks a unit. Needs a nickname like, I'm not googling the spelling everytime I mention him, I still get paranoid I've spelled Struijk wrong.
Post Reply